A MARKET FOR SOVEREIGN CONTROL?
Joseph Blocher & Mitu Gulati*
ABSTRACT
Across the world, many regions are located in the wrong nations—
wrong in the sense that the people of these regions believe they would be
safer, happier, and wealthier if surrounded by different borders and
governed by different leaders. These people might be able to improve their
lot by voting out their current government or by emigrating, but those are
imperfect solutions and are often unavailable to those who need them most.
We ask whether the addition of a new tool—a market for sovereign
control—could help ameliorate the bad government problem by facilitating
welfare-enhancing border changes. The essential elements of this market are
already in place, albeit in ways that under-protect principles like democratic
accountability. We suggest ways to design a market that could ameliorate
those problems and improve the status quo, and specifically how that
market might help ameliorate the current sovereign debt crisis in Ukraine.
A Market for Sovereign Control? [19-Mar-15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract..................................................................................................................1
Table of Contents..................................................................................................2
Introduction...........................................................................................................3
I. The Elements of the Market............................................................................8
A. Starting Points...........................................................................................8
B. The Market Mechanism............................................................................9
1. Who Must Agree ..............................................................................9
2. Three Approaches to Price-Setting ................................................10
3. Best Practices ...................................................................................13
C. The Corporate Analogy............................................................................13
II. The Legality of the Market for Sovereign Control......................................16
A. The Traditional Rule: Territorial Sovereignty and National
Control.....................................................................................................17
B. Modern Principles: Self Determination and Popular Control..............20
C. Filling the Gap...........................................................................................22
III. The Four Horsemen ......................................................................................25
A. War.............................................................................................................25
1. Preventing Incipient Conflicts........................................................26
2. Resolving Existing Disputes............................................................28
B. Colonialism ................................................................................................30
C. Anti-Democracy ........................................................................................33
D. Impossibility ..............................................................................................36
IV. Caveats and Complications...........................................................................38
Conclusion: Crimea 2015 .....................................................................................40
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen